Assessments Not Capturing Growth
When it comes to assessing student progress and academic growth, it is crucial to have multiple data points that triangulate with each other. However, there may be instances where the assessments being used do not align or correlate with other data points. In such cases, it is important for us to take proactive steps to ensure accurate tracking of student improvement.
Firstly, it is essential to critically analyze the assessments being used. Consider whether they are aligned with the curriculum and learning objectives. Assessments should be designed in a way that reflects what students have learned and progress towards mastery.
Where do the biases in the assessments lie? All assessments are (or should be) grounded in research and experience, and whatever prior knowledge gave rise to any given assessment, there is room for bias. The prior results and the humans designing and guiding these assessments are inherently biased, and thus, we need to consider which students are disadvantaged by the assessment. Of course, we can’t stop with identifying barriers such as bias. We’re trying to make an impact, and this can become a barrier…THE barrier, at times. We should strive to overcome this by being contextual: through looking at other sources of information, for formative assessments that help us determine student progress. For summative or state-level, year end assessments, our goal becomes to determine how to help teach, support, and coach students how to master assessments that may not have been designed for them. We want our collective hard work to show in the results, even if we don’t agree with the system. It’s a system of accountability.
The system by which we track progress matters.
If assessments are not showing similar results that correlate with other data points, we explore alternative assessment methods or tools. This could involve using different types of assessments such as performance-based tasks, portfolios, or project-based evaluations. These alternative methods can provide a more comprehensive view of student growth by capturing different aspects of learning.
In addition to diversifying assessment methods, progress monitoring should be an ongoing process rather than relying solely on periodic assessments. Regular check-ins and formative assessments can help track student progress more effectively. This allows educators to identify areas where students may need additional support or intervention in a timely manner.
Furthermore, collaboration among teachers and departments is crucial in ensuring accurate tracking of student improvement. By sharing insights and data across subjects or grade levels, educators gain a holistic understanding of each student's academic growth.
Lastly, it is important for schools and educators to remain focused on student growth rather than solely relying on assessment results. While assessments provide valuable information, they should not be the sole determinant of a student's progress. It is essential to consider other factors such as classroom observations, engagement levels, and social-emotional development when evaluating overall growth.
By adopting a multi-faceted approach towards assessing and tracking student improvement while remaining focused on growth as individuals, we ensure a more comprehensive understanding of each student's academic journey.
